QuantLogix

CME vs ICE — live signal comparison

Head-to-head on QuantLogix's 5-factor quant engine, recomputed throughout the trading day. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

engine lead
CME
CME Group Inc.
65/100
BUY
$269.53 · +2.98% · $94.7B
52% of similar setups up in 5d
Full scorecard →
VS
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange Inc.
50/100
BUY
$140.53 · +1.12% · $78.6B
68% of similar setups up in 5d
Full scorecard →
Factor by factor — CME (left) vs ICE (right)
62
Technical
24
56
Momentum
56
75
Fundamental
75
77
Options
64

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads CME Group Inc. (CME) at 65/100 (buy) and Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) at 50/100 (buy). CME carries the stronger composite read by 15 points, led by options at 77/100. ICE's strongest leg is fundamental at 75/100. In pattern backtesting, 52% of 50 CME setups and 68% of 50 ICE setups rose within five trading days. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track CME with free signal alerts Browse all scorecards
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. CME scorecard · ICE scorecard · CME earnings · ICE earnings · Today's movers · Verified track record