QuantLogix

CME vs ICE — live signal comparison

Head-to-head on QuantLogix's 5-factor quant engine, recomputed throughout the trading day. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

engine lead
CME
CME Group Inc.
53/100
BUY
$259.32 · -1.76% · $94.8B
68% of similar setups up in 5d
Full scorecard →
VS
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange Inc.
52/100
BUY
$151.25 · +0.47% · $84.5B
56% of similar setups up in 5d
Full scorecard →
Factor by factor — CME (left) vs ICE (right)
47
Technical
36
42
Momentum
52
67
Fundamental
58
53
Options
46
67
Microstructure
77

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads CME Group Inc. (CME) at 53/100 (buy) and Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) at 52/100 (buy). CME carries the stronger composite read by 1 points, led by fundamental at 67/100. ICE's strongest leg is microstructure at 77/100. In pattern backtesting, 68% of 50 CME setups and 56% of 50 ICE setups rose within five trading days. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track CME with free signal alerts Browse all scorecards
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. CME scorecard · ICE scorecard · CME earnings · ICE earnings · Today's movers · Verified track record