QuantLogix

COST vs WMT — live signal comparison

Head-to-head on QuantLogix's 5-factor quant engine, recomputed throughout the trading day. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation Common Stock
70/100
STRONG BUY
$997.4 · -0.78% · $397.1B
58% of similar setups up in 5d
Full scorecard →
VS
engine lead
WMT
Walmart Inc. Common Stock
71/100
STRONG BUY
$119.63 · -0.58% · $846.8B
56% of similar setups up in 5d
Full scorecard →
Factor by factor — COST (left) vs WMT (right)
68
Technical
66
50
Momentum
52
66
Fundamental
46
36
Options
59
77
Microstructure
81

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads Costco Wholesale Corporation Common Stock (COST) at 70/100 (strong buy) and Walmart Inc. Common Stock (WMT) at 71/100 (strong buy). WMT carries the stronger composite read by 1 points, led by microstructure at 81/100. COST's strongest leg is microstructure at 77/100. In pattern backtesting, 58% of 50 COST setups and 56% of 50 WMT setups rose within five trading days. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track WMT with free signal alerts Browse all scorecards
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. COST scorecard · WMT scorecard · COST earnings · WMT earnings · Today's movers · Verified track record