QuantLogix

VFH vs XLF — ETF comparison

Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
49/100
NEUTRAL
$141.56 · +0.28% · Financials
Full ETF page →
VS
engine lead
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
73/100
STRONG BUY
$57.84 · +0.45% · Sector SPDR
Full ETF page →
Factor by factor — VFH (left) vs XLF (right)
63
Technical
63
57
Momentum
57
48
Fundamental
63
22
Options
21
33
Microstructure
82
Trailing performance — VFH (left) vs XLF (right)
+11.3%
6-month return
+10.0%
1-year return
+50.3%
5-year return
Holdings overlap — 38.4% by weight · 45 shared positions
5.03%
5.77%
4.25%
4.59%
4.17%
7.20%
2.97%
2.81%
2.56%
2.81%
2.10%
2.30%
1.44%
1.62%
1.19%
1.51%
Largest VFH-only positions: MKL 0.28% · LPLA 0.26% · EWBC 0.20% · NLY 0.18% · PNFP 0.18%
Largest XLF-only positions: BLK 1.97%

From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-07-29 / 2026-05-28), computed on the 253 of 411 and 46 of 76 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 49/100 (neutral) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 73/100 (strong buy). XLF carries the stronger composite read by 24 points, led by microstructure at 82/100. VFH's strongest leg is technical at 63/100. By filed portfolio weights, at least 38.4% of the two funds overlaps across 45 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track XLF with free signal alerts Browse all 4,900+ ETF rankings
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. VFH ETF page · XLF ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record