QuantLogix

SCHG vs VUG — ETF comparison

Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
48/100
NEUTRAL
$35.25 · -0.62% · Factor / Style
Full ETF page →
VS
engine lead
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
49/100
NEUTRAL
$87.86 · -1.14% · Growth / Value
Full ETF page →
Factor by factor — SCHG (left) vs VUG (right)
71
Technical
73
54
Momentum
49
48
Fundamental
49
65
Options
79
35
Microstructure
32
Trailing performance — SCHG (left) vs VUG (right)
+16.6%
6-month return
+15.5%
1-year return
+87.5%
5-year return
Holdings overlap — 49.3% by weight · 64 shared positions
11.01%
13.31%
9.83%
12.32%
7.17%
9.09%
5.67%
4.59%
1.92%
1.65%
1.48%
1.48%
1.40%
1.33%
1.27%
1.36%
Largest SCHG-only positions: TMO 0.65% · BLK 0.52% · DHR 0.40% · PH 0.37% · TT 0.35%
Largest VUG-only positions: LRCX 0.90% · ORCL 0.85% · MCD 0.75% · APH 0.53% · WELL 0.47%

From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-07-24 / 2026-05-28), computed on the 120 of 193 and 101 of 153 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 48/100 (neutral) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 49/100 (neutral). VUG carries the stronger composite read by 1 points, led by options at 79/100. SCHG's strongest leg is technical at 71/100. By filed portfolio weights, at least 49.3% of the two funds overlaps across 64 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track VUG with free signal alerts Browse all 4,900+ ETF rankings
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. SCHG ETF page · VUG ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record