QuantLogix

IWF vs VUG — ETF comparison

Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
40/100
SELL
$123.07 · -1.61% · Factor / Style
Full ETF page →
VS
engine lead
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
49/100
NEUTRAL
$87.86 · -1.14% · Growth / Value
Full ETF page →
Factor by factor — IWF (left) vs VUG (right)
59
Technical
73
48
Momentum
49
50
Fundamental
49
24
Options
79
30
Microstructure
32
Trailing performance — IWF (left) vs VUG (right)
+11.9%
6-month return
+11.4%
1-year return
+77.7%
5-year return
Holdings overlap — 57.5% by weight · 82 shared positions
12.92%
13.31%
11.64%
12.32%
8.82%
9.09%
4.66%
4.59%
1.84%
1.65%
1.60%
1.48%
1.47%
1.36%
1.45%
1.33%
Largest IWF-only positions: LLY 2.66% · ABBV 1.39% · AMGN 0.50% · MCK 0.36% · TT 0.34%
Largest VUG-only positions: WELL 0.47% · WDC 0.17% · TMUS 0.17% · WCN 0.15% · VMC 0.13%

From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-05-22 / 2026-05-28), computed on the 272 of 387 and 101 of 153 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 40/100 (sell) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 49/100 (neutral). VUG carries the stronger composite read by 9 points, led by options at 79/100. IWF's strongest leg is technical at 59/100. By filed portfolio weights, at least 57.5% of the two funds overlaps across 82 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track VUG with free signal alerts Browse all 4,900+ ETF rankings
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. IWF ETF page · VUG ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record