Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.
From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-08-24 / 2026-08-24), computed on the 639 of 870 and 257 of 368 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.
QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 57/100 (buy) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 66/100 (buy). IWF carries the stronger composite read by 9 points, led by microstructure at 71/100. IWD's strongest leg is microstructure at 69/100. On trailing price performance, IWD leads over the last year (+22.2% vs +7.8% for IWF). By filed portfolio weights, at least 14.1% of the two funds overlaps across 159 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. IWD ETF page · IWF ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record