Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.
From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-08-27 / 2026-08-25), computed on the 588 of 603 and 1046 of 2013 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.
QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 42/100 (sell) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 65/100 (buy). IWM carries the stronger composite read by 23 points, led by microstructure at 70/100. IJR's strongest leg is technical at 63/100. On trailing price performance, IWM leads over the last year (+25.1% vs +22.4% for IJR). By filed portfolio weights, at least 34.1% of the two funds overlaps across 386 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. IJR ETF page · IWM ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record