Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.
From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-08-27 / 2026-08-25), computed on the 587 of 603 and 1044 of 2013 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.
QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 52/100 (buy) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 60/100 (buy). IWM carries the stronger composite read by 8 points, led by technical at 62/100. IJR's strongest leg is options at 65/100. On trailing price performance, IJR leads over the last year (+15.9% vs +15.4% for IWM). By filed portfolio weights, at least 34% of the two funds overlaps across 385 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. IJR ETF page · IWM ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record