QuantLogix

GLD vs GLDM — ETF comparison

Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.

GLD
SPDR Gold Trust, SPDR Gold Shares
32/100
NEUTRAL
$380.14 · -0.68% · Commodity
Full ETF page →
VS
engine lead
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares
46/100
NEUTRAL
$82.05 · -0.68% · Commodity
Full ETF page →
Factor by factor — GLD (left) vs GLDM (right)
38
Technical
35
42
Momentum
42
60
Fundamental
59
46
Options
—
46
Microstructure
78
Trailing performance — GLD (left) vs GLDM (right)
-11.5%
6-month return
-11.3%
+7.2%
1-year return
+7.5%
+131.0%
5-year return
+134.6%
Holdings overlap

Real filed-weight overlap for this pair lands as QuantLogix's SEC N-PORT sweep reaches both funds — 4,290 of ~5,000 funds indexed so far. No proxy numbers here: we show overlap only from each fund's own filings.

QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads SPDR Gold Trust, SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 32/100 (neutral) and SPDR Gold MiniShares (GLDM) at 46/100 (neutral). GLDM carries the stronger composite read by 14 points, led by microstructure at 78/100. GLD's strongest leg is fundamental at 60/100. On trailing price performance, GLDM leads over the last year (+7.5% vs +7.2% for GLD). Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.

Track GLDM with free signal alerts Browse all 4,900+ ETF rankings
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →

Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. GLD ETF page · GLDM ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record