Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.
From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-06-25 / 2026-06-25), computed on the 43 of 705 and 61 of 2632 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.
QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 48/100 (neutral) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 69/100 (buy). IEFA carries the stronger composite read by 21 points, led by technical at 72/100. EFA's strongest leg is technical at 72/100. On trailing price performance, EFA leads over the last year (+17.6% vs +17.3% for IEFA). By filed portfolio weights, at least 13.5% of the two funds overlaps across 43 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. EFA ETF page · IEFA ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record