Two funds head-to-head: live engine reads, trailing performance, and holdings overlap from SEC filings. An engine-read comparison — not a recommendation.
From each fund's SEC N-PORT filing (2026-06-25 / 2026-09-23), computed on the 44 of 705 and 61 of 2625 equity positions matched to the QuantLogix stock universe — a lower bound, never an estimate.
QuantLogix's 5-factor engine currently reads iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 78/100 (strong buy) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 80/100 (strong buy). IEFA carries the stronger composite read by 2 points, led by microstructure at 97/100. EFA's strongest leg is microstructure at 97/100. On trailing price performance, EFA leads over the last year (+10.3% vs +10.2% for IEFA). By filed portfolio weights, at least 14.2% of the two funds overlaps across 44 shared positions. Signals recompute throughout the trading day — the balance can shift with the tape.
🤖 Want the deeper take? Pro runs a 10-agent AI debate on either name — 5 analysts, bull vs bear, a risk read, and a trader's verdict. See Pro →Educational market analysis, not investment advice. QuantLogix does not provide personalized recommendations. EFA ETF page · IEFA ETF page · ETF rankings · Equities Network · Verified track record